Above them or with them?
"We are not victims of our situation. We are the architects of it." Simon Sinek
Here is your answer to that subject line. Yes. It can be both. Indeed, if you are a leader you are seen in a hierarchical sense to be on top. People view organizations like they do organizational charts. The manager, coach, president, or CEO is at the top, employees or team members are down below. A leader cannot avoid, nor should they, being above or on top. Those who see themselves too much as one of the folks marginalize the position they hold and the requirements and duties of it. I do not subscribe to the leaderless organization. While residing on top, there is a way to be with them.
Being with them is easier in a small team. A leader does not have far to travel. I'm a small business owner with 5 people under me and I find it easy to be with them doing what they do, albeit to a far lesser ability. I certainly cannot do everything but there are some jobs I can do and have to when we are down a man or the situation warrants.
In a large organization, being with them means spending time in the rank and file, inquiring about what they do, learning from them, sharing hardship, and even assisting where possible. In a large organization, layers are present. There will be mid-level managers leading teams below the boss or CEO. It is not as easy for the 'above' leader to thrust him or herself into a team without first coordinating with the leader of that team. In fact, it can be disruptive. There is another way to be with them and that is through the spoken word.
Speaking in terms of 'we' will help a leader be with 'them.' "Ok team we are going to climb this mountain together. Each of you do your jobs to the best of your ability and support each other. I will shield you from other tasks and distractions and you'll have a direct line to me should you need any obstacles taken down." "We're all in this together!" This kind of talk (backed by action) promotes a spirit of togetherness, of everyone giving way together. After this kind of togetherness language, a leader can then make a point to be with subordinates as they take on challenges.
In summary, I believe it to be a powerful approach to leading - being with them in word and deed. Leaders should never forget their roles leading, strategizing, promoting their team, and thinking to name a few. A balanced approach is best. Too much sitting behind a desk while the team is panting and sweating or too much time behind a broom or shovel ignoring ones leadership role will do damage.
Above them or with them? Think this through then make the call through your language and your actions.
Make it Personal!
Rob
Rob Campbell